Rudy: co-owner or paid poster?

[BobbyFK]

how did Rudy obtain his information?
Is he involved with BMR somehow? Sleeping with the owner??

What's the story here?

 

[Enikk]

Inquiring minds want to know...Things that make you go hmmmmm...

 

[Enikk]

Don't forget he is posting winning monster tickets and talk of being sober? Do we know this guy?

 

[Wagerallsports]

He's always had access to inside info everywhere

 

[Enikk]

He's always had access to inside info everywhere

Good point. The whole "I receive PMs/emails" or I am the "player's advocate"

 

[carolinakid]

i bet he knows who was on the grassy knoll too if he was press

 

[Chip Williams]

I don’t agree with Rudy on every issue, but that aside he seems to be on top of his posting and handicapping game right now.

 

[RudyRuder]

RELAX

A very small percentage of the time I found some things out....Most of the time posters told me things they wanted made public. Judging by who it is, I either ask for more info (unknown poster) or post it knowing they are respectable. I don't mention which scenario it is. Maybe they didn't want the attention/backlash involved in it or don't have time to reply to comments, I don't know. And, I never say who told me the information, except for 3 times..... even though there has been a ton more.

1. USCPhillyguy made it known in the poker thread that he's the one that accused someone in whatever that situation was. So I confirmed it

2. Cincykid caught someone... I think using both bitcoin and sportsbookcash in the store. After I created a thread, he kinda provided all the information so it was pretty obvious it came from him.

3. semibluff (castelion over here) via lowercase kvb (name here) about sbrpoints- i made a post about point system being fukked up and open to scammers. even when i was permabanned, I didnt mention it was from him. Only after he started taking shots at me, agreeing i was part of some big point conspiracy to optional did i have enough of that fukkwad


Did we get confirmation on this case regarding merkturk? I WILL GO CHECK


Sincerely,

Judge Rudy (AKA: SLAMMER)

 

[BobbyFK]

RELAX

A very small percentage of the time I found some things out....Most of the time posters told me things they wanted made public. Judging by who it is, I either ask for more info (unknown poster) or post it knowing they are respectable. I don't mention which scenario it is. Maybe they didn't want the attention/backlash involved in it or don't have time to reply to comments, I don't know. And, I never say who told me the information, except for 3 times..... even though there has been a ton more.

1. USCPhillyguy made it known in the poker thread that he's the one that accused someone in whatever that situation was. So I confirmed it

2. Cincykid caught someone... I think using both bitcoin and sportsbookcash in the store. After I created a thread, he kinda provided all the information so it was pretty obvious it came from him.

3. semibluff (castelion over here) via lowercase kvb (name here) about sbrpoints- i made a post about point system being fukked up and open to scammers. even when i was permabanned, I didnt mention it was from him. Only after he started taking shots at me, agreeing i was part of some big point conspiracy to optional did i have enough of that fukkwad


Did we get confirmation on this case regarding merkturk? I WILL GO CHECK


Sincerely,

Judge Rudy (AKA: SLAMMER)

Thanks for the clarification

 

[Bubbles]

no wonder merkturk never posted anything aside from contest entries. such a shame dude

 

[Enikk]

no wonder merkturk never posted anything aside from contest entries. such a shame dude

This right here brings up an important conversation. Contests are a fun way for new members to bond with the group and not be so shy. You often wonder when you see someone new what their true intentions are. Are they just in it for the freebie, are they a double dipping ghost, or are they shy and is just a good way to feel a part of the forum.

Some you will see immediately get into arguments which just doesn't happen if you are truly new to forums in general and shows you are usually a ghost of a Veteran poster. I always like the "I found your forum on a google search" and than are immediately in contests and getting involved in drama arguments day 1.

 

[The Wanderer]

no wonder merkturk never posted anything aside from contest entries. such a shame dude

Why is he even allowed to log in? Get him out.

 

[Bubbles]

how about you require new account members to have a number of good post before they can enter any of this free contest?

This right here brings up an important conversation. Contests are a fun way for new members to bond with the group and not be so shy. You often wonder when you see someone new what their true intentions are. Are they just in it for the freebie, are they a double dipping ghost, or are they shy and is just a good way to feel a part of the forum.

Some you will see immediately get into arguments which just doesn't happen if you are truly new to forums in general and shows you are usually a ghost of a Veteran poster. I always like the "I found your forum on a google search" and than are immediately in contests and getting involved in drama arguments day 1.

right? we don't want cheaters here. we all know once a cheater, always a cheater.

Why is he even allowed to log in? Get him out.

 

[Tanko]

how about you require new account members to have a number of good post before they can enter any of this free contest?


right? we don't want cheaters here. we all know once a cheater, always a cheater.

I like the idea but a downside is you might get some who post crap for hours on end (one word posts) just to meet the criteria. It would be tough to police their posts to say what's a "good" post.

Good start though.

 

[Bubbles]

you also have a good point tanko.

 

[Enikk]

I have a plan for future contests. Rules and expectations of posters will be documented in better detail for one. I will also set up a committee of a 3 to 5 members who will be voted in to stand on this board when problems do arise so we come to a reasonable conclusion. Of course BMR has the right to overturn any decision they would like or feels is deemed necessary but I feel they will honor our decisions.

I personally think the member involved in this recent scandal Slackerdude would be a perfect member for this committee and would get my vote. Slacker likes contests and has played enough of them to know how to take advantage of them and his red flags would go up quicker than anyone else. Slackers picks were legit and by the rules. He even posted his plays early in the morning so even if lines were stale at that time they could have still moved against or a more enticing line could of came available. His record is legit and I hope the jury of his peers see it that way.

I guess this should have been posted in the other thread but wanted to answer Bubbles question