I'm not saying his opponent is great but at least Warnock can comprehend and discuss issues as well as understand what the hell a senator is actually supposed to do.
BTW, I don't think Warnock has paid for any abortions, beat his GF/wife, or threatened police like Walker. So I guess that gives him a leg up on being more appeasing to the public.
Are we supposed to vote republican regardless of how good the canidate is??? If so, that will lead to a lot of dumb-a$$es in office.
The problem here is we need to stop looking at it as Dem or Rep; it's more Authoritarian versus Libertarian these days.
Authoritarian takes a warm body and a partyline vote to strip individuals of rights & freedoms, whereas Libertarians need not show up even because they don't intend to vote for ANYTHING that takes from you or reduces personal liberties or economic opportunities.
So in that sense, to exaggerate my example, the Country would be best served w 51 Senators & 220 Reps of the same mindset who simply never bothered to show up, except for passing balanced budgets or a SCOTUS judge.
At this point, I'm all for simply shutting down the Gov, moving towards austerity to reduce the debt, and operating a balanced budget.
Everything else is wide open. No more EOs shutting down work, no more ridiculous spending programs