stormtrooper8
stormtrooper8
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 30, 2022
- Messages
- 11,018
No I understand it fullyThis post makes me realize you don't understand what I'm saying, and I'm not sure I can be clearer without a ton of words.
It's a bit like a conversion problem, but not really, it's just a multiplaction problem and I feel like you understand that but for some reason decide to leave the vig in on the individual bets then remove it for the parlay as if to say that is shorting the odds or to make a point.
I don't understand your point, it doesn't seem relevant.
If the bet is -110, the it's -110. If a parlay of two of those together pays proper, the EV doesn't change by putting them together, it's the variance that changes.
+264 for hitting two -110's is objectively long-term value worse value that betting two separately.
If you bet $100 for a two-team parlay at +264, you're expected profit is about -$9
If you took that $100 and instead bet $50 on each leg, you're expected profit is about -$5.05
What you're not accounting for is that juice doesn't simply move proportionally with the single leg prices. It's compounded